The Cloward-Piven strategy is a political strategy developed in 1966 by sociologists Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven. It was detailed in an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” published in The Nation. The primary objective of the strategy is to create a political and economic crisis by overloading the welfare system. This would compel the government to adopt a guaranteed annual income to ensure economic stability and reduce poverty.
The strategy works by encouraging the full enrollment of eligible welfare recipients, thereby creating a bureaucratic and fiscal crisis. Cloward and Piven believed this would strain local and state governments to the point of collapse, forcing federal intervention and the establishment of a national system of income redistribution. They aimed to disrupt the existing welfare system to highlight its inefficiencies and injustices, pushing for broader liberal reforms through mass mobilization and public demonstrations.
The strategy also envisioned the use of mass media to inform and rally support from the broader liberal community. By fostering public awareness and promoting activism, Cloward and Piven aimed to generate institutional disruption, leading to significant social and political change. This included leveraging crises, whether spontaneous or orchestrated, to bring attention to systemic issues and drive legislative action.
COVID-19 Pandemic Response: Some argue that the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including lockdowns, business closures, and extensive stimulus packages, aligns with the Cloward-Piven strategy. The massive government spending and the increase in welfare dependency are seen as steps towards creating a crisis that necessitates significant federal intervention and income redistribution (–) (The Hammer Drops podcast).
Immigration Policies: The current administration’s handling of immigration, especially with the increase in illegal crossings and the extension of welfare benefits to non-citizens, is cited as another application of the Cloward-Piven strategy. The influx of immigrants and their enrollment in welfare programs are believed to strain local and state resources, pushing for more centralized federal solutions (CAIRCO Report) (AMAC).
Universal Basic Income (UBI) Initiatives: Several cities in the United States, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Denver, have implemented or are testing UBI programs. These initiatives are seen as direct implementations of the income redistribution aspect of the Cloward-Piven strategy. The funding for these programs often comes from federal sources like the American Rescue Plan, further indicating a shift towards federal control and income redistribution (AMAC).
Media Influence and Public Perception: The role of the media in shaping public perception and promoting narratives that support these policies is also seen as part of the strategy. By highlighting the inefficiencies and injustices in the current system, the media helps to create a climate of urgency and crisis, which can drive support for extensive government intervention and reforms (Conduit for Action).
These elements suggest that aspects of the Cloward-Piven strategy may be influencing current political and economic policies, leading to debates about the long-term implications for American society and governance.
For further details, you can explore the full articles on Cloward-Piven.com, The Hammer Drops, and CAIRCO Report